Circeus ( talk) 01:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC) They are. And I say that as someone who worked for a couple month on an all-encompassing naming scheme and at no point whatsoever considered that this could possibly be an issue whatsoever. When they start being actually used in conflicting way (Which I don't see happening any time soon), someone will bother coming up with an actual proposal. What to do? - DePiep ( talk) 23:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Nothing. DePiep ( talk) 21:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Whether we like it or not, ( WASSER) and ( uexSTR) are used for the same (unused/unnavigable water).
#Colorset idl full
Alternative: reproduce all uexXXX and uXXX for water (WASSER and NAVIGATABLEWASSER) in a full separate set. If uSTR is used for water, then uexSTR is in it too. uSTR has to do with water (by BSicon usage evolution). Circeus ( talk) 16:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Yes, is what I wrote. Obviously we need both available because uexSTR means "former light-rail track" in railway icons, which has nothing to do with water whatsoever. DePiep ( talk) 21:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC) WASSER serves a different purpose than the uexSTR icons as used by canal projects. My question is: what (lighter blue) color do we use for non-navigable water? Now there enters a third shade of blue: the disused underground track: ( uexSTR) 00 #6281c0 (another light blue). All fine so far (except when one wants to show the New York underground after the Sandy water flow -) ). By origin, as I understand it, water color is based upon a railtrack crossing: ( WASSER) 00 #007cc3 (light blue), and afterwards we use the "u" (underground) prefix & color to signify navigable water: ( uSTR) 00 #003399 (dark blue).
0 kommentar(er)
